The editor’s alternative is the article by Willebrand and Newey: “Reaching and implementing the most effective accessible data in wildlife biology”
In a time when AI is dominating the discourse on how we generate data, Tomas Willebrand and Scott Newey advocate for not forgetting old-school empirical approaches in wildlife ecology, particularly fieldwork and the intimate understanding of the research species and research system it gives. On this opinion piece, they tackle the prevailing developments in wildlife biology analysis and problem the emphasis on publication metrics that prioritise amount over high quality. The paper additionally underscores the significance of interdisciplinary and long-term research that transcend the constraints of short-term, narrowly-focused analysis tasks. It encourages the engagement of scholars and researchers instantly with their research environments, fostering real ecological understanding and inference. The paper additionally requires improved assist from funding our bodies and efficient data switch to practitioners, arguing for the alignment of analysis with real-world functions and societal wants.
/Ilse Storch
Editor-in-Chief
Classes:
